Sata's Plan

Michael Sata continues his attack on the reputation of the Election Commission of Zambia and again accuses them of preparing to rig the forthcoming election.

His tirade is nothing more than a desperate attempt to inflate the expectations of his cadre and bait them in to reacting violently when (and not if) he loses the presidential by-election.

This is hardly a new tactic for a politician who has built his reputation by being a bully! If anyone needs a reminder of Sata’s past tactical thinking, they just need to review this BBC article (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/5396884.stm) and look at these photos to remind themselves of the sort of thing that the PF candidate is planning.

The Sata strategy is one that is employed when a candidate knows he is going to lose the election, but wants to unfairly affect the outcome through a program of intimidation once the results are announced. Normally this strategy would be expected to have little potential success but recent events around Africa, namely the elections in Kenya and Zimbabwe, prompt concerns. Because their election results were set aside and an ‘Africa Solution to an African problem’ was negotiated through mediation. It is not by accident that recent stories have been placed in our media trying to set the expectation that a Kenya or Zimbabwe government of national unity will be necessary after the election.

The actions of Sata and his followers have not gone unnoticed, as reports in today’s paper have stated. The Inspector General of the Police, Ephraim Mateyo has summoned the Anti-Rigging of Zambia president, Kelvin Bwalya to report to police headquarters or face arrest. The Inspector General intends to warn the Sata supporter that stern action will be taken against those who continue to make statements of their intent to take power through unconstitutional means.

This is actually what the Sata campaign is attempting to do and is something that Zambians need to be aware of, it is your duty to spread this message; the Zambian people do not want a coup d’etat, they want a smooth transition and a true democratic election to find someone to fulfill the Late President’s term.

Treason

Often, when politicians make a statement we, the electorate, tend to ignore the words that are being spoken.This is especially true during campaign period, which is sometimes referred to as the ‘silly season’! This is the time when politicians seem to want to promise us the world, knowing full well that they could never deliver on these pledges. Yet we take no notice of these empty vows and continue to vote for them.

However ever, once in a while a politician makes a remark that we all need to sit up and take notice of. Michael Sata has just made just such a comment. This weekend Sata announced that there would be no elections in 2011 for president, because he feels that the 30th October by-election will give the winner (whom he thinks will be himself) a full term to serve for five years.

This statement is tantamount to treason!

If Sata were to carry out his demand and extend his term beyond the mandated period of time as set out in Article 88(6) of the constitution, he would be committing a treasonous act by orchestrating a coup d’etat.

One of the many reasons why this statement is so concerning is that this is not the first time the PF Presidential candidate has shown scant regard for the Zambian constitution. In 2001 it was Sata that proposed that President Chiluba disregard the term limits set in the constitution, amend the bill of rights and run for a third term. Thankfully the constitution withstood this ill-thought out and dangerous challenge. But what other attacks would our fundamental principles have to endure if Sata were to be elected president?

What Sata’s comment demonstrates is that he truly represents the old style African politician. African history in the post-colonial period has been rife with leaders who have disregarded their nation’s constitution, rejected the rule of law and presided over their country with total impunity. Since 1991 and even more so since 2001, Zambia and its people have fought to be a nation based on the rule of law, where all citizens are equally protected and not only those who are part of a certain politician’s cadre. This is something that we as a nation we should be very proud of and something we should defend.

Michael Sata represents the bad old days of history, to bring such a dated politician in to power after several years of great progress in Zambia would provide another yet example of how the promise of a nation can be taken single handedly by an individual’s ego and greed!